They met up the following day. Ms A decided to confront him about the two obvious love bites on his neck as well. He claimed that she was responsible for them, but Ms A refuted that it wasn’t her. She later verified that it wasn’t Ms B as well.
The reason given was that the KL trip made him realise his feelings for Ms B. So they ended things at Ya Kun in Clarke Quay.
In his words, as shared by Ms A, “I have feelings for you, but you were right on Monday. I can’t two-time the both of you. I have to choose, and I know Ms B longer. And it’s just gonna be weird.”
He hoped that if Ms A were to meet Ms B, she would help him lie that they matched around early April before he had matched with Ms B – when in fact, they had been talking since end-March.
At this point, Ms A was left with more questions and decided it was only right for her to warn others about Kylen’s ways. So she proceeded to meet with Ms B, wanting to wish her all the best if Kylen had indeed chosen her.
Since they had scheduled a meet-up anyway – Ms A and Ms B met up at a restaurant in Clarke Quay.
As they went over the details, Ms A and Ms B realised there had been signs of the two-timing, and possibly triple-timing, from the start.
Ms B recalled spotting some artwork at his house – an acrylic painting, signed off with a female name. Kylen had said it was given to him by a friend.
That same name was on his 7-year-old Macbook and Spotify account. Oddly enough, it seemed like the same name followed him wherever he went, but when he was asked who it was, he replied she was “just a friend”.
Ms A also shared that when she visited, she was told to specify the wrong unit number when she was checking in at the guard house to avoid his “psycho ex”.
Both women, after verification with Ms C, realised to their horror that the apartment which they had stayed over in – wasn’t Kylen’s place as he had claimed – but in fact, belonged to her.
Uncovering Kylen’s alleged “psycho ex”
It was now 2am at Clarke Quay, and both Ms A and Ms B were still there, trying to unpack the details and inconsistencies in their relationships with Kylen.
Both girls decided to investigate this further to see if they could reach out to other potential victims who were possibly played in a similar fashion. They decided to contact Kylen’s “psycho ex” to clarify her side of the story.
After doing some sleuthing, they reached out to the woman, identified as Ms T, via an IG handle that Ms B saw in an IG story he showed her once on his deactivated account.
To their horror, Ms T replied and said they were probably “the 16th person” to have reached out to her in the past year.
Ms T added that when she was still in a relationship with him, five other girls reached out to her on Instagram and they met up.
Finally, Ms T alleges Kylen texted her to say that he missed her two days https://datingreviewer.net/local-hookup/barrie/ ago on 17 May – the day he was supposed to tell Ms B to remain as friends.
Potentially serious allegations involving authorities
Over the course of both relationships, Ms A and Ms B have expressed concerns over certain actions that Kylen allegedly took: